40-Year QA Expert & Boeing Shareholder Daryl Guberman Exposes Alarming Quality Failures in Boeing's Military and Commercial Aircraft
eTravel Wire/10325380

NEW CITY, N.Y. - eTravelWire -- IMPORTANT NOTE TO READERS AND MEDIA

We use PRLog to publish our truth and documented assessments based on over 40 years in Quality Assurance, including 14 years running my own business. We possess all corroborating data, paperwork, letters, and evidence that mainstream media outlets—such as Politico, Bloomberg, Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and others—refuse to share. These organizations do not want the public to know about the failures of federal agencies and corporations charged with oversight.

This includes Boeing commercial aircraft and Boeing military aircraft—both built under the same flawed model of "send your certificate, send your parts, and if need be, and the need arises, Boeing will come visit your facility," all while reducing redundant inspections.

Contact: Daryl Guberman – 203-556-1493

Aviation safety advocate, Boeing shareholder, and quality systems expert Daryl Guberman today issued an unflinching public warning to travelers, regulators, and lawmakers, reigniting the urgent debate over Boeing's quality control and certification practices.

Invoking the blunt phrase, "I'm going on a jet plane – if it's a Boeing, I won't be back again," Guberman draws a direct line between unchecked supplier self-certification and a collapse in manufacturing integrity.

"The public is boarding aircraft that were assembled under a system where Boeing accepts mailed supplier certificates instead of conducting rigorous, on-site audits," Guberman stated. "This is not oversight—it's blind trust, and it's costing lives."

Special note: ANSI-American National Standards Institute & ANAB-American National Accreditation Board (ANSI took over complete control of ANAB in 2018) ANSI-ANAB founded IAF (International Accreditation Forum incorporated in Delaware- its sister organization in Australia is ILAC- International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation) IAF& ILAC are associations of accreditation bodies national and international equivalent to ANSI-ANAB who are their underwriters. This means any systematic or product failure ANSI-ANAB are responsible for.

More on eTravel Wire

• Golden Visa Countries Outpace Eurozone Growth Over Eight Years, New La Vida Analysis Finds
• Allstream Energy Partners Announced as Official Media Partner for the 2nd Annual Permian Power Conference
• New Tool Lets Retirees Compare 126 Countries Side-by-Side Using 24 Personalized Metrics
• CCHR Calls Out Psychiatry's Pattern of Resistance to Antidepressant Deprescribing
• Boston Industrial Solutions Introduces New Natron® 310 Hyper White UV Ink for Enhanced Printing Performance

Guberman references Boeing's supplier bulletins:

• April 2002: Addressed NADCAP certification for heat treatment, welding, and non-destructive testing—all flight-critical characteristics. Suppliers were instructed to send in their certificates and parts, with on-site audits only if need be or if the need arises.
  
  
• July 2002: Addressed AS9100 certification. This bulletin stipulated that the certificate must be accredited by ANSI/ANAB, explicitly calling out this requirement on Boeing's supplier portal and website. The Management Accreditation Committee has the authority to grant, suspend, and withdraw certification. The bulletin also reinforced the same "send in your certificate, send in your parts, and only if need be, or need arises, will Boeing visit your facility," which significantly reduces redundant inspection.

Guberman stresses that the same flawed approach is mirrored in military programs, including the sixth-generation military aircraft Boeing is currently building (designations consistent with the classified programs), as well as ongoing programs like the V-22 Osprey. Boeing relied on suppliers mailing in certificates and shipping parts without direct, on-site verification. That same paper-driven model was applied to the V-22 Osprey program. The result? A system where unchecked certifications substituted for true oversight—creating the perfect conditions for defects to slip through and for preventable tragedies to take flight: Example:

• Gearbox material defects:
• These failures trace to metallic inclusions and impurities in gears made from alloy X-53. These flaws were known from 2011 to 2014, yet risk assessments and corrective measures were insufficient. Attention Reader: Was this because Boeing was following the commercial division's supplier bulletins of April and July 2002—'send your certificate, send your parts, and only if need be, or if the need arises, Boeing will visit your facility'—thereby reducing redundant inspections?"

Suppliers serving commercial programs also supply military programs, so the same self-certification system applies across both sectors, raising questions about the integrity of aircraft our service members fly.

More on eTravel Wire

• Southern Utah Adventure Center Releases Ultimate Guide to Sand Hollow UTV Rentals and Adventures
• Southern Utah Retreats Highlights Why Southern Utah Has Become America's Ultimate Retreat Playground
• New analysis reveals second job workers keep just 80p in every pound they earn
• NRE Health Institute Launches International Study Examining Motivations Behind Non-Sexual Nudity
• Hurghada Reiseberater baut kulturelle Reisen und Ausflüge in Ägypten weiter aus

Guberman's Call to Action:

• Mandatory third-party, on-site audits for all critical suppliers in both commercial and military programs.
• Full public transparency of Boeing's AS9100 and NADCAP certification history.
• A federal investigation into whether inspection shortcuts contributed to in-service failures and fatalities.

"This isn't just about one plane, one model, or one incident," Guberman warns. "It's about a corporate culture where schedule and profit have been allowed to outrun safety. On the commercial side alone, between 8,000 and 12,000 aircraft were assembled under this same 'send your certificate, send your parts' inspection methodology. Until Boeing can prove its aircraft are worthy of public trust, my warning stands."

Boarding Your Next Flight? You Might Be Playing Boeing's Deadliest Lottery https://www.prlog.org/13092956-boarding-your-next-flight-you-might-be-playing-boeings-deadliest-lottery.html#

22 Years Of Fraud: AS9100 Suppliers BETRAYED By Boeing And ANSI-ANAB — A Call For A Class Action Lawsuit https://www.prlog.org/13080085-22-years-of-fraud-as9100-suppliers-betrayed-by-boeing-and-ansi-anab-call-for-class-action-lawsuit.htm l

The Largest Industrial Scam Ever Perpetrated Worldwide Started With Boeing https://www.prlog.org/13092416-the-largest-industrial-scam-ever-perpetrated-worldwide-started-with-boeing.html#

Before You Fly: QA Expert & Boeing Shareholder DARYL GUBERMAN Exposes Hidden Dangers The Public (Business Owners), FAA, and DOJ Turn a Blind Eye to Boeing's Fake Quality & Safety Certifications—Now We Know Why https://www.prlog.org/13088849-before-you-fly-qa-expert-boeing-shareholder-daryl-guberman-exposes-hidden-dangers.html#

The Certification Conspiracy: How Boeing Faked Aerospace Quality for 20 Years and Forced Everyone Else to Pay for It https://www.prlog.org/13079809-the-certification-conspiracy-how-boeing-faked-aerospace-quality-for-20-years-and-forced-everyone-else-to-pay-for-it.html